FOR INDIAN ADVOCATES — DISTRICT & HIGH COURTS

Verified legal intelligence for Indian advocates.

Six stages of one matter — intake to case strength — over a real corpus of Indian judgments and statutes. Every citation carries a verdict, the source that answered, and a link to read the judgment itself.

Three verdicts. Never a bare green tick.
The NyayMitra case workspace for Sharma v. Mehta — case header with offence date and limitation deadline, six-stage tracker, module output cards, and the authorities rail with tri-state verification chips.
THE CASE WORKSPACE — PRODUCT UI, NOT A RENDER.

01

Verification honesty

Three verdicts, a named corpus, and quoted evidence passages. We never claim more than the corpus supports — unverified is not “wrong”, and we say so.

02

The case spine

A matter is opened once and flows through six stages. Every module reads the case record and writes back to it — no six disconnected chat boxes.

010203040506

03

Pin-citable paragraphs

Retrieval and drafting cite our own paragraph numbering of real judgments — down to the paragraph, marked ¶36 · NM NUMBERING so provenance is never ambiguous.

What our verdicts mean — and what they don’t.

The citation resolves to a real judgment or provision in a named source, and you can open it and read it in context. It is not a claim that the source says what the citing text asserts — that judgement stays yours.

We looked in the corpus and found nothing matching. That is absence of evidence, never disproof — and we name what the corpus covers so you know what was searched.

Outside the corpus we checked. Every verification names its coverage — court, subject, and cut-off date — so silence is never dressed up as assurance.

JUDGMENT CORPUS: DATTAM LABS VIA AWS OPEN DATA · CC-BY-4.0 — STATUTORY TEXT: INDIA CODE — AI-ASSISTED ANALYSIS · ADVOCATE MUST VERIFY · NOT LEGAL ADVICEPRIVACYTERMSENGLISH UI · © 2026 NYAYMITRA